See above what men write: you have to work at 48! As if there is an abundance of well paying jobs available to a SAHM after a long gap with employment. These men are totally self centered and disconnected from reality. If I was playing my marriage history again, I would not have stayed at home and supported his traveling career without a stone clad postnup |
My friend got it for 7 years. Marriage was 15. |
The problem I see is that deep down most men don’t care if their wife stays home. Whereas a lot of these wives talk about how much they are doing for the family, the sacrifices etc. However, their husbands don’t care and place little value on it. They are just going along with it. Then 10 years later they get divorced and the wives talk about how they gave everything up, quit their jobs for their family. Problem is their husbands never asked for that. |
Most judges would not have called him out on the timing of his "firing." Also, most lawyers would have hired a professional to determine his earning potential. I'd go back to court on this one. |
+1 At a minimum keep one foot in the door with part time. Once you fully step out it’s nearly impossible to get back in in middle age. |
I think you’re wrong about consent for staying home. I know lots of families where the working spouse does not want the other spouse to be SAH. Heck, read DCUM. I think people acquiesce be wise they get tired of arguing about it. But that’s different than consent. |
Meant: Most judges would have called him out |
My salary is higher than what his alimony would have been, and I am building my resume. Going to court back than trying to call him out meant missing another 2 years of my life, work history and health, in addition to $200K in legal fees. He also could had forced sale of marital assets causing me even higher financial harm vs me just loosing his alimony. So I settled and got marital assets I wanted intact. I know that alimony cannot be changed after I signed MSA, but I am taking him back to court for the child support. He's incredibly cheap with our son, and refuses to pay his college expenses. |
Yes, totally wrong. It was absolutely clearly stated at the time of me getting married that my exH wanted me to put the family first |
So weird that that is your take on women getting screwed when men dump them. |
Agree: the number of SAH women who absolutely get screwed exceeds the number of those who are getting hefty alimony by large margin! If your ex is a jerk who makes you fight over every cent of alimony and CS in court, or even over assets claiming he's eligible for more than 50%, this will drive you into huge legal fees. They can claim anything in court, fully being aware they wouldn't win. But the point is not to win for such jerks but to drive your legal costs nuts so you would settle for less. Court process can take 2-3 years and a very rare SAHM would have funds to finance the battle. The reward of legal fees to her is also not guaranteed in the end. That's what my jerk exH did, and I found it easier to get a quick certification (took 6 months) and going back to work |
Mine ended up going directly according to the guidelines. My ex did not fight it. We were married for just over 7 years. I ended up with alimony for 2.5 after the settlement, so 3.5 including the year we were separated. I thought that was fair. Gave me enough time to gather myself and become situated after working part-time for many years to support his career which required significantly more hours weekly. |
There are tons of jobs available. Maybe the ex should pay for schooling and time to go to school with childcare and then be done with alimony. |
The problem with the courts doesn't seem to be alimony. It seems to be childcare. The childcare stipend someone has to pay to support children is way too small and does not cover college at all. And people will fight custody just so they don't have to pay it which is weird because actually having custody is more expensive. |
These tons of jobs available are low paying jobs. I went to make $55,000/year after 10 years at home. My salary prior to SAH was $85,000 15 years ago. The point of alimony is not just to compensate for re-eduction but also for huge income discrepancy between spouses. Thus this "formula" If he's making $1mm after she supported him for years at home with 3 kids, the exW should not be left on $50K/year income alone |