Los Angeles mayor

[Anonymous]

1/3 of all hospices in the USA are located in Los Angeles.

Bass has known this fact for months, and likely years, and she has not done a thing to stop this obviously corruption. She is not fit to lead.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pratt is gonna win this one. She is an awful candidate.

Great, another reality star who has never worked a day in his life. I’m sure that’s exactly what Los Angeles needs.

Bass is a radical, pro-crime Marxist who has ruined L.A.

Last year, LA literally had the lowest murder rate since 1959. What in god’s name are you babbling about?

You know who is a crook? Spencer Pratt demanding a government bailout while not paying his insurance bill.

Anyone who isn't a dishonest moron is well aware that crime stats can be gamed very easily. For instance, one can produce a decrease in "murders" simply by redefining what counts as "murder" and changing what sources are included.

If you want to make the "murder" rate as accurate as possible (and, thus, as high as possible), then all deaths that are recorded as homicides on the death certificate are counted as murders. This number is what tells you your odds of being intentionally killed in a certain community. This number is what normal human beings consider the murder rate.

Most law enforcement agencies, however, tinker with their definitions depending on political pressures. Right now, the FBI and most law enforcement agencies count as "murders" only homicides that the police decide were committed with malice aforethought. It means that most manslaughters don't count, nor do homicides that the police haven't yet classified as murder, nor do deaths for which the police have decided the cause of death is ambiguous (and that incentivizes police not to delve too deeply into the causes of death of people who don't have anyone advocating for them).

Does recording steady drops in "murder" by bastardizing the definition of "murder" sound like good news to you?

Babbling lies.

You can't cover up dead bodies. The independent coroner - a medical doctor - decides what is a homicide. Not the cops.

Try again.

I'm from Los Angeles and it's safer than anytime in modern history. Objectively safer. In the 1980s we had to sleep under the table on NYE because so many people shot off guns at night and the falling bullets fell into houses. Gang and drug violence was insane, drive-by shootings were endemic.

That violence has pretty much disappeared completely.

Just stop lying.

Oh. You understood my post to mean I think the police are hiding bodies? I'm so sorry then. I didn't mean to overwhelm you with information too complex for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pratt is gonna win this one. She is an awful candidate.

Great, another reality star who has never worked a day in his life. I’m sure that’s exactly what Los Angeles needs.

Bass is a radical, pro-crime Marxist who has ruined L.A.

Last year, LA literally had the lowest murder rate since 1959. What in god’s name are you babbling about?

You know who is a crook? Spencer Pratt demanding a government bailout while not paying his insurance bill.

Anyone who isn't a dishonest moron is well aware that crime stats can be gamed very easily. For instance, one can produce a decrease in "murders" simply by redefining what counts as "murder" and changing what sources are included.

If you want to make the "murder" rate as accurate as possible (and, thus, as high as possible), then all deaths that are recorded as homicides on the death certificate are counted as murders. This number is what tells you your odds of being intentionally killed in a certain community. This number is what normal human beings consider the murder rate.

Most law enforcement agencies, however, tinker with their definitions depending on political pressures. Right now, the FBI and most law enforcement agencies count as "murders" only homicides that the police decide were committed with malice aforethought. It means that most manslaughters don't count, nor do homicides that the police haven't yet classified as murder, nor do deaths for which the police have decided the cause of death is ambiguous (and that incentivizes police not to delve too deeply into the causes of death of people who don't have anyone advocating for them).

Does recording steady drops in "murder" by bastardizing the definition of "murder" sound like good news to you?

Babbling lies.

You can't cover up dead bodies. The independent coroner - a medical doctor - decides what is a homicide. Not the cops.

Try again.

I'm from Los Angeles and it's safer than anytime in modern history. Objectively safer. In the 1980s we had to sleep under the table on NYE because so many people shot off guns at night and the falling bullets fell into houses. Gang and drug violence was insane, drive-by shootings were endemic.

That violence has pretty much disappeared completely.

Just stop lying.

Oh. You understood my post to mean I think the police are hiding bodies? I'm so sorry then. I didn't mean to overwhelm you with information too complex for you.

NP here. Provide evidence that LAPD is fudging the crime statistics or STFU.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:1/3 of all hospices in the USA are located in Los Angeles.

Bass has known this fact for months, and likely years, and she has not done a thing to stop this obviously corruption. She is not fit to lead.

So confused…what does this have to do with corruption?

[Anonymous]

There are so many prime examples of fraud and waste in LA, and particularly inside California’s extensive homeless industrial complex.

For example, California bought this hotel for $8 million in 2020 and now wants $20 million to fix it. That is $625,000 per homeless person.

6 years later and NOTHING to show. The hotel is abandoned with no work done to make it inhabitable. In fact, it’s deteriorating and will probable need to be torn down.

How is this even possible? Bass does not have the answers. She represents continual waste, fraud, failure, and a deteriorating quality of life in LA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pratt is gonna win this one. She is an awful candidate.

Great, another reality star who has never worked a day in his life. I’m sure that’s exactly what Los Angeles needs.

Bass is a radical, pro-crime Marxist who has ruined L.A.

Last year, LA literally had the lowest murder rate since 1959. What in god’s name are you babbling about?

You know who is a crook? Spencer Pratt demanding a government bailout while not paying his insurance bill.

Anyone who isn't a dishonest moron is well aware that crime stats can be gamed very easily. For instance, one can produce a decrease in "murders" simply by redefining what counts as "murder" and changing what sources are included.

If you want to make the "murder" rate as accurate as possible (and, thus, as high as possible), then all deaths that are recorded as homicides on the death certificate are counted as murders. This number is what tells you your odds of being intentionally killed in a certain community. This number is what normal human beings consider the murder rate.

Most law enforcement agencies, however, tinker with their definitions depending on political pressures. Right now, the FBI and most law enforcement agencies count as "murders" only homicides that the police decide were committed with malice aforethought. It means that most manslaughters don't count, nor do homicides that the police haven't yet classified as murder, nor do deaths for which the police have decided the cause of death is ambiguous (and that incentivizes police not to delve too deeply into the causes of death of people who don't have anyone advocating for them).

Does recording steady drops in "murder" by bastardizing the definition of "murder" sound like good news to you?

Babbling lies.

You can't cover up dead bodies. The independent coroner - a medical doctor - decides what is a homicide. Not the cops.

Try again.

I'm from Los Angeles and it's safer than anytime in modern history. Objectively safer. In the 1980s we had to sleep under the table on NYE because so many people shot off guns at night and the falling bullets fell into houses. Gang and drug violence was insane, drive-by shootings were endemic.

That violence has pretty much disappeared completely.

Just stop lying.

Oh. You understood my post to mean I think the police are hiding bodies? I'm so sorry then. I didn't mean to overwhelm you with information too complex for you.

NP here. Provide evidence that LAPD is fudging the crime statistics or STFU.

And if I don't do your research for you while continuing to post, what then?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pratt is gonna win this one. She is an awful candidate.

Great, another reality star who has never worked a day in his life. I’m sure that’s exactly what Los Angeles needs.

Bass is a radical, pro-crime Marxist who has ruined L.A.

Last year, LA literally had the lowest murder rate since 1959. What in god’s name are you babbling about?

You know who is a crook? Spencer Pratt demanding a government bailout while not paying his insurance bill.

Anyone who isn't a dishonest moron is well aware that crime stats can be gamed very easily. For instance, one can produce a decrease in "murders" simply by redefining what counts as "murder" and changing what sources are included.

If you want to make the "murder" rate as accurate as possible (and, thus, as high as possible), then all deaths that are recorded as homicides on the death certificate are counted as murders. This number is what tells you your odds of being intentionally killed in a certain community. This number is what normal human beings consider the murder rate.

Most law enforcement agencies, however, tinker with their definitions depending on political pressures. Right now, the FBI and most law enforcement agencies count as "murders" only homicides that the police decide were committed with malice aforethought. It means that most manslaughters don't count, nor do homicides that the police haven't yet classified as murder, nor do deaths for which the police have decided the cause of death is ambiguous (and that incentivizes police not to delve too deeply into the causes of death of people who don't have anyone advocating for them).

Does recording steady drops in "murder" by bastardizing the definition of "murder" sound like good news to you?

Babbling lies.

You can't cover up dead bodies. The independent coroner - a medical doctor - decides what is a homicide. Not the cops.

Try again.

I'm from Los Angeles and it's safer than anytime in modern history. Objectively safer. In the 1980s we had to sleep under the table on NYE because so many people shot off guns at night and the falling bullets fell into houses. Gang and drug violence was insane, drive-by shootings were endemic.

That violence has pretty much disappeared completely.

Just stop lying.

Oh. You understood my post to mean I think the police are hiding bodies? I'm so sorry then. I didn't mean to overwhelm you with information too complex for you.

NP here. Provide evidence that LAPD is fudging the crime statistics or STFU.

And if I don't do your research for you while continuing to post, what then?

Then everyone will know that you’re full of sh!t.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pratt is gonna win this one. She is an awful candidate.

Great, another reality star who has never worked a day in his life. I’m sure that’s exactly what Los Angeles needs.

He’s a pissed off homeowner who’s sick of what Bass did to his city. I think he is exactly what they need.

He’s an asshat who didn’t have home owners insurance and then demanded a government bailout.

You tell them! People who don't have homeowner's insurance in the most expensive state in the nation deserve a government that can't find water to put out fires. That's that Democratic mentality.

MAGA looooves white men freeloaders!

[Anonymous]

Spencer Pratt should quit whining and pull himself up by the bootstraps.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pratt is gonna win this one. She is an awful candidate.

Great, another reality star who has never worked a day in his life. I’m sure that’s exactly what Los Angeles needs.

He’s a pissed off homeowner who’s sick of what Bass did to his city. I think he is exactly what they need.

He’s an asshat who didn’t have home owners insurance and then demanded a government bailout.

Fire insurance was prohibitively expensive in that area due to predatory insurance companies changing their rules over the last decade.

I hope Spencer wins honestly. Karen Bass is what is wrong with the democrats. The other candidate who gained steam was a "socialist" who lived in her gated 2.5 + million dollar home and not among the communities actually impacted day to day by drug addicts and homeless encampments.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pratt is gonna win this one. She is an awful candidate.

Great, another reality star who has never worked a day in his life. I’m sure that’s exactly what Los Angeles needs.

Bass is a radical, pro-crime Marxist who has ruined L.A.

Last year, LA literally had the lowest murder rate since 1959. What in god’s name are you babbling about?

You know who is a crook? Spencer Pratt demanding a government bailout while not paying his insurance bill.

Anyone who isn't a dishonest moron is well aware that crime stats can be gamed very easily. For instance, one can produce a decrease in "murders" simply by redefining what counts as "murder" and changing what sources are included.

If you want to make the "murder" rate as accurate as possible (and, thus, as high as possible), then all deaths that are recorded as homicides on the death certificate are counted as murders. This number is what tells you your odds of being intentionally killed in a certain community. This number is what normal human beings consider the murder rate.

Most law enforcement agencies, however, tinker with their definitions depending on political pressures. Right now, the FBI and most law enforcement agencies count as "murders" only homicides that the police decide were committed with malice aforethought. It means that most manslaughters don't count, nor do homicides that the police haven't yet classified as murder, nor do deaths for which the police have decided the cause of death is ambiguous (and that incentivizes police not to delve too deeply into the causes of death of people who don't have anyone advocating for them).

Does recording steady drops in "murder" by bastardizing the definition of "murder" sound like good news to you?

DP. Ok so what are your stats that she is pro-crime? Also how exactly has she ruined LA? I loved there 15 years ago and it was never that great. Garbage public transportation, downtown not really well developed, lots of homeless from the east coast, etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pratt is gonna win this one. She is an awful candidate.

Great, another reality star who has never worked a day in his life. I’m sure that’s exactly what Los Angeles needs.

He’s a pissed off homeowner who’s sick of what Bass did to his city. I think he is exactly what they need.

He’s an asshat who didn’t have home owners insurance and then demanded a government bailout.

Fire insurance was prohibitively expensive in that area due to predatory insurance companies changing their rules over the last decade.

I hope Spencer wins honestly. Karen Bass is what is wrong with the democrats. The other candidate who gained steam was a "socialist" who lived in her gated 2.5 + million dollar home and not among the communities actually impacted day to day by drug addicts and homeless encampments.

+1000.

She is another nepo-baby Marxist like Hassan Piker.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pratt is gonna win this one. She is an awful candidate.

Great, another reality star who has never worked a day in his life. I’m sure that’s exactly what Los Angeles needs.

He’s a pissed off homeowner who’s sick of what Bass did to his city. I think he is exactly what they need.

He’s an asshat who didn’t have home owners insurance and then demanded a government bailout.

Fire insurance was prohibitively expensive in that area due to predatory insurance companies changing their rules over the last decade.

I hope Spencer wins honestly. Karen Bass is what is wrong with the democrats. The other candidate who gained steam was a "socialist" who lived in her gated 2.5 + million dollar home and not among the communities actually impacted day to day by drug addicts and homeless encampments.

Californian here and same. I am so, so tired of limousine liberals and their destructive “rules for thee but not for me” governance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pratt is gonna win this one. She is an awful candidate.

Great, another reality star who has never worked a day in his life. I’m sure that’s exactly what Los Angeles needs.

He’s a pissed off homeowner who’s sick of what Bass did to his city. I think he is exactly what they need.

He’s an asshat who didn’t have home owners insurance and then demanded a government bailout.

Fire insurance was prohibitively expensive in that area due to predatory insurance companies changing their rules over the last decade.

I hope Spencer wins honestly. Karen Bass is what is wrong with the democrats. The other candidate who gained steam was a "socialist" who lived in her gated 2.5 + million dollar home and not among the communities actually impacted day to day by drug addicts and homeless encampments.

That's still not as bad as Pratt lying about living in a trailer, when he resided between the Hotel Bel Air, a 5-star hotel, and his parents multiple homes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pratt is gonna win this one. She is an awful candidate.

Great, another reality star who has never worked a day in his life. I’m sure that’s exactly what Los Angeles needs.

He’s a pissed off homeowner who’s sick of what Bass did to his city. I think he is exactly what they need.

He’s an asshat who didn’t have home owners insurance and then demanded a government bailout.

Fire insurance was prohibitively expensive in that area due to predatory insurance companies changing their rules over the last decade.

I hope Spencer wins honestly. Karen Bass is what is wrong with the democrats. The other candidate who gained steam was a "socialist" who lived in her gated 2.5 + million dollar home and not among the communities actually impacted day to day by drug addicts and homeless encampments.

Californian here and same. I am so, so tired of limousine liberals and their destructive “rules for thee but not for me” governance.

+1