Los Angeles mayor

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Bass is moving forward to the runoff, and I don’t think the Raman voters are going for Pratt.

What is a Raman voter, may I ask?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bass is moving forward to the runoff, and I don’t think the Raman voters are going for Pratt.

What is a Raman voter, may I ask?

Clearly you’re a troll who isn’t from LA. All the people who love Pratt don’t even live in LA city.

She’s the leftist who got 20% of the primary vote. They ain’t moving to Pratt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bass is moving forward to the runoff, and I don’t think the Raman voters are going for Pratt.

What is a Raman voter, may I ask?

Exactly. Lol. It's going to be Pratt v. Bass.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pratt is gonna win this one. She is an awful candidate.

Great, another reality star who has never worked a day in his life. I’m sure that’s exactly what Los Angeles needs.

Bass is a radical, pro-crime Marxist who has ruined L.A.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bass is moving forward to the runoff, and I don’t think the Raman voters are going for Pratt.

What is a Raman voter, may I ask?

Exactly. Lol. It's going to be Pratt v. Bass.

Yesterday decided who was going to the runoff. The three main candidates were Bass, Pratt, and Raman. Raman was knocked out at this round but she received 21 percent of the vote. It will be Pratt and Bass only in November

https://ktla.com/news/politics/los-angeles-mayor-primary-election/amp/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pratt is gonna win this one. She is an awful candidate.

Great, another reality star who has never worked a day in his life. I’m sure that’s exactly what Los Angeles needs.

Bass is a radical, pro-crime Marxist who has ruined L.A.

Last year, LA literally had the lowest murder rate since 1959. What in god’s name are you babbling about?

You know who is a crook? Spencer Pratt demanding a government bailout while not paying his insurance bill.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pratt is gonna win this one. She is an awful candidate.

Great, another reality star who has never worked a day in his life. I’m sure that’s exactly what Los Angeles needs.

Bass is a radical, pro-crime Marxist who has ruined L.A.

Last year, LA literally had the lowest murder rate since 1959. What in god’s name are you babbling about?

You know who is a crook? Spencer Pratt demanding a government bailout while not paying his insurance bill.

Bass is awful

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bass is moving forward to the runoff, and I don’t think the Raman voters are going for Pratt.

What is a Raman voter, may I ask?

Exactly. Lol. It's going to be Pratt v. Bass.

Yesterday decided who was going to the runoff. The three main candidates were Bass, Pratt, and Raman. Raman was knocked out at this round but she received 21 percent of the vote. It will be Pratt and Bass only in November

https://ktla.com/news/politics/los-angeles-mayor-primary-election/amp/

Only half the vote has been counted and AP hasn’t called it yet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pratt is gonna win this one. She is an awful candidate.

Great, another reality star who has never worked a day in his life. I’m sure that’s exactly what Los Angeles needs.

Bass is a radical, pro-crime Marxist who has ruined L.A.

Last year, LA literally had the lowest murder rate since 1959. What in god’s name are you babbling about?

You know who is a crook? Spencer Pratt demanding a government bailout while not paying his insurance bill.

It's a MAGA talking point. "[Democratic candidate] is a pro-crime Marxist/Socialist/Demonrat that's ruined [major city]"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bass is moving forward to the runoff, and I don’t think the Raman voters are going for Pratt.

What is a Raman voter, may I ask?

Exactly. Lol. It's going to be Pratt v. Bass.

Yesterday decided who was going to the runoff. The three main candidates were Bass, Pratt, and Raman. Raman was knocked out at this round but she received 21 percent of the vote. It will be Pratt and Bass only in November

https://ktla.com/news/politics/los-angeles-mayor-primary-election/amp/

Thanks for restating my point?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pratt is gonna win this one. She is an awful candidate.

Great, another reality star who has never worked a day in his life. I’m sure that’s exactly what Los Angeles needs.

He’s a pissed off homeowner who’s sick of what Bass did to his city. I think he is exactly what they need.

There are plenty of pissed off homeowners that have more accomplishments than pissed of LC on national tv.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jeff deleted my post, but butthurt Democrats can't delete reality. Spencer Pratt is going to send Karen Bass packing because voters are sick of Democrats prioritizing absolute foolishness over real-life problems. A Republican is going to be mayor of LA, a Republican is going to be governor of California, and another Republican will win in 2028. This moron Bill Maher droning on about solar panels while Spencer Pratt schools him on real issues exemplifies why Democrats need to be thrown away:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eDpp36MJ3Hw&ra=m

Republicans aren’t going to be mayor or governor—they will lose the runoffs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pratt is gonna win this one. She is an awful candidate.

Great, another reality star who has never worked a day in his life. I’m sure that’s exactly what Los Angeles needs.

Bass is a radical, pro-crime Marxist who has ruined L.A.

Last year, LA literally had the lowest murder rate since 1959. What in god’s name are you babbling about?

You know who is a crook? Spencer Pratt demanding a government bailout while not paying his insurance bill.

Anyone who isn't a dishonest moron is well aware that crime stats can be gamed very easily. For instance, one can produce a decrease in "murders" simply by redefining what counts as "murder" and changing what sources are included.

If you want to make the "murder" rate as accurate as possible (and, thus, as high as possible), then all deaths that are recorded as homicides on the death certificate are counted as murders. This number is what tells you your odds of being intentionally killed in a certain community. This number is what normal human beings consider the murder rate.

Most law enforcement agencies, however, tinker with their definitions depending on political pressures. Right now, the FBI and most law enforcement agencies count as "murders" only homicides that the police decide were committed with malice aforethought. It means that most manslaughters don't count, nor do homicides that the police haven't yet classified as murder, nor do deaths for which the police have decided the cause of death is ambiguous (and that incentivizes police not to delve too deeply into the causes of death of people who don't have anyone advocating for them).

Does recording steady drops in "murder" by bastardizing the definition of "murder" sound like good news to you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pratt is gonna win this one. She is an awful candidate.

Great, another reality star who has never worked a day in his life. I’m sure that’s exactly what Los Angeles needs.

Bass is a radical, pro-crime Marxist who has ruined L.A.

Last year, LA literally had the lowest murder rate since 1959. What in god’s name are you babbling about?

You know who is a crook? Spencer Pratt demanding a government bailout while not paying his insurance bill.

Anyone who isn't a dishonest moron is well aware that crime stats can be gamed very easily. For instance, one can produce a decrease in "murders" simply by redefining what counts as "murder" and changing what sources are included.

If you want to make the "murder" rate as accurate as possible (and, thus, as high as possible), then all deaths that are recorded as homicides on the death certificate are counted as murders. This number is what tells you your odds of being intentionally killed in a certain community. This number is what normal human beings consider the murder rate.

Most law enforcement agencies, however, tinker with their definitions depending on political pressures. Right now, the FBI and most law enforcement agencies count as "murders" only homicides that the police decide were committed with malice aforethought. It means that most manslaughters don't count, nor do homicides that the police haven't yet classified as murder, nor do deaths for which the police have decided the cause of death is ambiguous (and that incentivizes police not to delve too deeply into the causes of death of people who don't have anyone advocating for them).

Does recording steady drops in "murder" by bastardizing the definition of "murder" sound like good news to you?

Babbling lies.

You can't cover up dead bodies. The independent coroner - a medical doctor - decides what is a homicide. Not the cops.

Try again.

I'm from Los Angeles and it's safer than anytime in modern history. Objectively safer. In the 1980s we had to sleep under the table on NYE because so many people shot off guns at night and the falling bullets fell into houses. Gang and drug violence was insane, drive-by shootings were endemic.

That violence has pretty much disappeared completely.

Just stop lying.

[Anonymous]

A reality star, super villain, with no experience in anything running one of the countries largest cities. Sounds vaguely familiar. What could possibly go wrong?